|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Look back
at the 2003 RunningBack Projections -
80 % Success
| |
2002 |
2003 |
2003 |
Projection |
|
Player |
Actual |
Projection |
Expected |
Actual |
Result |
Direction |
|
Holmes,P |
26.6 |
18.5 |
 |
23.3 |
|
 |
|
Williams,R |
20.2 |
20.8 |
 |
14.5 |
|
 |
|
Tomlinson,L |
19.2 |
20.3 |
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
Portis,C |
18.1 |
19.1 |
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
Alexander,S |
17.0 |
16.1 |
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
McAllister,D |
18.0 |
18.7 |
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
Barber,T |
16.5 |
14.8 |
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
Henry,T |
16.2 |
15.2 |
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
Garner,C |
16.0 |
13.5 |
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
George,E |
14.1 |
13.3 |
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
Taylor,F |
13.8 |
13.1 |
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
Lewis,J |
13.7 |
17.1 |
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
Green,A |
15.5 |
19.3 |
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
Faulk,M |
14.9 |
17.5 |
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
Staley,D |
12.8 |
12.3 |
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
Dillon,C |
12.7 |
12.0 |
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
Bennett,M |
12.5 |
3.9 |
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
Martin,C |
11.7 |
16.0 |
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
Dunn,W |
12.3 |
10.0 |
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
Hearst,G |
11.4 |
9.8 |
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
Shipp,M |
12.8 |
8.1 |
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
Smith,A |
10.7 |
9.4 |
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
James,E |
10.9 |
18.9 |
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
Davis,S |
12.0 |
12.3 |
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
Smith,E |
8.5 |
8.3 |
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
Zereoue,A |
8.4 |
11.3 |
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
Williams,M |
8.3 |
7.9 |
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
Smith,L |
12.0 |
1.6 |
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
Bettis,J |
10.5 |
7.0 |
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
Pittman,M |
7.8 |
9.5 |
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
A Look back
at the 2003 Quarterback Projections - 73
% Success
| |
2002 |
2003 |
2003 |
Projection |
|
Player |
Actual |
Projection |
Expected |
Actual |
Result |
Direction |
|
Gannon,R |
22.0 |
19.5 |
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
Culpepper,D |
21.2 |
20.9 |
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
Vick,M |
21.5 |
16.6 |
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
Manning,P |
19.2 |
20.2 |
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
Bledsoe,D |
18.9 |
16.7 |
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
Brooks,A |
18.4 |
17.7 |
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
Green,T |
18.2 |
16.8 |
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
McNair,S |
18.1 |
16.8 |
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
Brady,T |
18.1 |
16.2 |
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
Garcia,J |
17.8 |
17.9 |
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
Favre,B |
16.6 |
17.1 |
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
McNabb,D |
25.2 |
21.0 |
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
Collins,K |
15.7 |
16.5 |
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
Pennington,C |
16.6 |
5.9 |
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
Johnson,B |
17.8 |
13.9 |
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
Plummer,J |
13.8 |
16.3 |
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
Kitna,J |
17.0 |
14.6 |
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
Hasselbeck,M |
16.9 |
16.6 |
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
Brees,D |
13.7 |
14.5 |
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
Brunell,M |
14.3 |
12.1 |
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
Griese,B |
16.0 |
7.2 |
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
Maddox,T |
16.2 |
14.4 |
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
Couch,T |
13.3 |
5.1 |
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
Carr,D |
11.4 |
12.2 |
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
Fiedler,J |
15.2 |
13.6 |
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
Blake,J |
15.1 |
11.8 |
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
Bulger,M |
20.0 |
7.6 |
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
Harrington,J |
9.4 |
12.2 |
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
Ramsey,P |
11.4 |
13.6 |
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
Stewart,K |
14.4 |
13.2 |
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
A Look back
at the 2003 Wide Reciever Projections -
74 % Success
| |
2002 |
2003 |
2003 |
Projection |
|
Player |
Actual |
Projection |
Expected |
Actual |
Result |
Direction |
|
Harrison,M |
15.0 |
14.8 |
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
Owens,T |
15.9 |
15.1 |
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
Ward,H |
13.7 |
11.4 |
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
Moulds,E |
11.8 |
11.3 |
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
Moss,R |
11.7 |
14.2 |
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
Toomer,A |
11.4 |
12.0 |
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
Price,P |
11.1 |
10.2 |
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
Burress,P |
10.9 |
10.6 |
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
Horn,J |
10.8 |
10.2 |
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
Driver,D |
10.5 |
10.4 |
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
Rice,J |
10.3 |
8.9 |
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
Booker,M |
10.0 |
9.8 |
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
Coles,L |
10.7 |
9.9 |
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
Robinson,K |
10.0 |
11.1 |
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
Holt,T |
9.8 |
10.8 |
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
Bruce,I |
9.5 |
10.9 |
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
Gardner,R |
9.3 |
9.0 |
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
Johnson,C |
10.5 |
11.0 |
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
Smith,J |
9.1 |
7.9 |
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
Morgan,Q |
9.9 |
9.8 |
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
Johnson,K |
8.7 |
9.6 |
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
Smith,R |
8.4 |
9.8 |
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
Taylor,T |
8.3 |
9.6 |
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
Conway,C |
12.0 |
9.4 |
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
Mason,D |
10.1 |
10.3 |
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
Galloway,J |
9.3 |
6.9 |
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
Thrash,J |
8.3 |
8.7 |
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
Porter,J |
8.2 |
8.1 |
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
Chrebet,W |
8.2 |
8.1 |
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
Pinkston,T |
8.0 |
8.8 |
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
Finneran,B |
8.6 |
7.7 |
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
Bryant,A |
7.1 |
6.7 |
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
Patten,D |
7.5 |
8.4 |
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
Jackson,D |
9.3 |
9.4 |
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
Thompson,D |
7.8 |
7.3 |
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
Kennison,E |
6.8 |
7.3 |
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
Brown,T |
7.7 |
9.6 |
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
Stallworth,D |
8.3 |
9.7 |
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
Brown,T |
6.7 |
7.7 |
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
Northcutt,D |
8.9 |
6.0 |
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
Streets,T |
7.0 |
8.6 |
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
Smith,S |
7.0 |
7.1 |
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
Bradford,C |
7.5 |
8.1 |
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
McCaffrey,E |
6.5 |
6.4 |
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
Muhammad,M |
8.0 |
8.4 |
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
McCardell,K |
7.4 |
7.2 |
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
Johnson,K |
6.2 |
8.3 |
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
Chambers,C |
7.1 |
8.2 |
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
Warrick,P |
6.6 |
6.8 |
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
Wayne,R |
6.8 |
7.2 |
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
Glenn,T |
6.2 |
6.5 |
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
A Look back at the 2002 Tight End Projections
- 72 % Success
| |
2002 |
2003 |
2003 |
Projection |
|
Player |
Actual |
Projection |
Expected |
Actual |
Result |
Direction |
|
Heap,T |
7.7 |
7.4 |
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
Gonzalez,T |
7.5 |
7.6 |
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
Shockey,J |
6.8 |
7.9 |
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
Franks,B |
6.1 |
5.5 |
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
Sharpe,S |
7.2 |
5.1 |
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
Pollard,M |
5.6 |
5.4 |
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
Miller,B |
5.7 |
5.6 |
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
Crumpler,A |
5.0 |
5.4 |
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
McMichael,R |
4.9 |
4.8 |
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
Brady,K |
4.7 |
5.0 |
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
Fauria,C |
4.8 |
3.3 |
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
Conwell,E |
4.2 |
4.4 |
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
Mili,I |
4.8 |
3.0 |
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
Lewis,C |
4.4 |
4.3 |
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
Becht,A |
3.9 |
4.7 |
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
Jolley,D |
4.8 |
5.4 |
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
Ricks,M |
3.7 |
2.7 |
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
Walls,W |
4.4 |
3.5 |
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
Wycheck,F |
3.4 |
2.3 |
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
Kleinsasser,J |
3.4 |
2.6 |
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
Dilger,K |
3.5 |
3.3 |
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
Stevens,J |
3.9 |
4.6 |
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
Jones,F |
3.2 |
3.6 |
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
Chamberlain,B |
3.2 |
1.6 |
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
Dudley,R |
3.4 |
1.1 |
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
A Look back
at the 2002 Kicker Projections - 62 % Success
| |
2002 |
2003 |
2003 |
Projection |
|
Player |
Actual |
Projection |
Expected |
Actual |
Result |
Direction |
|
Feely,J. |
9.4 |
9.6 |
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
Gramatica,M. |
9.0 |
10.4 |
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
Akers,D. |
8.8 |
10.3 |
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
Carney,J. |
8.8 |
8.2 |
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
Janikowski,S. |
8.7 |
9.7 |
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
Longwell,R. |
8.4 |
9.9 |
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
Elam,J. |
8.3 |
9.5 |
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
Vinatieri,A. |
7.9 |
9.4 |
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
Mare,O. |
7.8 |
7.7 |
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
Andersen,M. |
8.9 |
7.3 |
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
Vanderjagt,M. |
7.2 |
9.1 |
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
Edinger,P. |
7.1 |
9.1 |
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
Hall,J. |
7.1 |
8.8 |
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
Lindell,R. |
7.1 |
7.8 |
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
Dawson,P. |
6.8 |
6.6 |
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
Hanson,J. |
6.7 |
7.1 |
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
Stover,M. |
7.0 |
8.0 |
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
Wilkins,J. |
6.3 |
7.7 |
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
Anderson,G. |
6.8 |
2.6 |
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
Christie,S. |
5.9 |
7.3 |
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
Brown,K. |
5.4 |
7.0 |
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
Rackers,N. |
5.1 |
2.6 |
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
Gramatica,B. |
5.1 |
6.6 |
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
Graham,S. |
5.4 |
6.9 |
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
Peterson,T. |
6.4 |
9.7 |
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
Chandler,J. |
3.5 |
6.5 |
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
Brien,D. |
5.3 |
7.1 |
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
Kasay,J. |
5.5 |
6.3 |
|
9.8 |
|
|
How did we do
in 2002? Click here to find out |
YOU MAKE THE CALL: Don't agree with any of our projections?
You can change and save any of the Fantistics Individual Player Projections
and compute your unique set of rankings!
New for 2005:Draft
Tracker/Advisor |
Features Included in the 2005 Fantasy
Football Package include
-
Fantasy Pro: Draft Prep Software - Detailed projections
on over 600 players, including defensive players, allowing you to
produce customized ranking lists based on your league rules.
-
VAM Draft Strategy - Drafting order based on the scarcity of each
position and the probability of predictability
-
Preseason Projection Notes - Not just the news, but relevant fantasy
projection changes
-
Position Battles/ Sleepers - knowing who the winners will be
-
Inside the Numbers Series - Which position players face the most difficult or
friendly schedule ahead
-
Historical Fantasy Databases - Which players are the most
consistent
year after year
-
Weekly Pickup Recommendations - which players are the ones to pickup
-
Injury News and analysis reports emails - Fantasy recommendations to
the daily news
-
Opposition Match up Matrix Database- Weekly plays and trading
reference tool
-
Weekly Player Rankings/Projections for your Team - Critical
Start/Bench decisions based on our successful weekly forecasting
-
Trending Player Analysis
-
Red Zone and Targeted Passes Databases - Spot the trends
-
Sunday Morning Scoop - Last minute activation /
deactivation alerts
|
|
|
|
Click
here to sign up today!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
